|
Post by admin on Sept 7, 2013 7:33:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by mickeeteeze on Sept 7, 2013 15:12:28 GMT -8
, I wonder what mean? I would guess, but according to you, that would make me a racist. Because you never bring up race. You are just constantly victimized by evil, Godless liberals. You are not a race baiter. Not at all. Oh, and thanks for the 'fair and balanced' link. That site is not a shill for Republican politics. I am a racist because I believe the OP is hinting that only 'you know who' votes for Obama because 'you know why'. Which is insane, Heeeeey would never do that. Ever. Under any circumstances. See, we can agree on lot's of stuff!
|
|
|
Post by biglin on Sept 7, 2013 15:54:56 GMT -8
Well, actually I can think of quite a few more.
To be honest I wanted McCain to win in 2008 but in 2012 Romney was so awful that Obama was the lesser of two evils.
To a floating (swing) voter like me there's no monopoly of virtue or vice in either party and I think (broadly) that anyone who always votes the same way either has a vested interest in the success of one particular party or is totally robotic and brainwashed!
(I've voted in every General Election in Britain since 1997 - four in all - and voted for a different party in each one - Labour in 1997, Conservative in 2001, UKIP in 2005 and Lib Dem in 2010!)
And I've no idea who I'll vote for in 2015!
|
|
|
Post by admin on Sept 7, 2013 17:35:53 GMT -8
, I wonder what mean? I would guess, but according to you, that would make me a racist. Because you never bring up race. You are just constantly victimized by evil, Godless liberals. You are not a race baiter. Not at all. Oh, and thanks for the 'fair and balanced' link. That site is not a shill for Republican politics. I am a racist because I believe the OP is hinting that only 'you know who' votes for Obama because 'you know why'. Which is insane, Heeeeey would never do that. Ever. Under any circumstances. See, we can agree on lot's of stuff!
That has been the standard response to anyone who opposes Obama and his policies..."that's racist." Well, I don't blame his incompetence on his race at all.
You can attack the messenger all you want, but you can't refute the message. At this point, the only reason for minorities to continue supporting him has got to be because he's half black. Why else? Things have gotten worse since he took office, and that hasn't been refuted, not even by Democrats. If you can show me a report that refutes what the WSJ reported, then please do.
For a POTUS who has used race and race-baited for political expediency from the start, race is always going to be involved because that's what he has always used. Remember, "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." Remember him calling the cops 'stupid' in that Gates thing?
Here's another interesting article for you:
www.naturalnews.com/041283_racism_theater_Obama_mainstream_media.html
Someone said on the Politics board that the poor always vote Democrat. So what would happen to the Democrat party if people were no longer poor? They'd lose power. So it stands to reason that everything they do is to keep people poor and dependent on government.
|
|
|
Post by mickeeteeze on Sept 8, 2013 15:59:06 GMT -8
See? But you are spinning the sh*t out of this. The actual point (on paper, at least) of the Democrat Party, is to raise these people out of poverty.
Now, I'll agree with you, the Party interests are controlled by the same money making whores who control Repubs. That's why I keep waiting (uselessly, apparently) for you to acknowledge who runs your party.
|
|